Terrific satire from The Onion. http://tinyurl.com/yja55lx

Tweet This Post

This article in the New York Times by David Barboza reminds us, once again, that the rise of Chinese expert hacking is real and a threat not only to Chinese citizens and government agencies but to the United States, our allies, our citizens, and our companies

Tweet This Post

In this time of terrible need for our fellow world citizens in Haiti, please join me in supporting relief organizations such as the Red Cross by giving at http://www.redcross.org/ or by texting “Haiti” to
90999 (to give $10).  I made a personal donation this morning online to the Red Cross International Response Fund.  Please join me.

Tweet This Post

Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia fame and Andrea Weckerle of CiviliNation had an excellent op-ed in the WSJ right before the new year. In it, they call for a more civil online dialogue, making the important point that vicious online attacks can too often silence discussion rather than advance or broaden it. There is always room in a free society for vigorous dialogue and debate. But when one party is attacked–often, online, anonymously–into silence, we can lose the value of the conversation and disagreement.

Some will no doubt respond to Wales and Weckerle with the opinion that their way forward would result in a chilling of speech; change the law or mores online even a smidgeon, the argument would go, and the immediate and necessary result is Stalinism– an icicle where there used to be free speech. The argument goes that anything other than the status quo is censorship. Not true.

Too often, online attacks yield a kind of “life censorship,” in which people are afraid to go about their lives, attend class, go on dates, apply for jobs, participate in online discourse, because they have been victimized on the Internet. In the words of Wales and Weckerle, from the op-ed:

“The Internet is bringing about a revolution in human knowledge and communication, and we have an unprecedented opportunity to make the global conversation more reasonable and productive. But we can only do so if we prevent the worst among us from silencing the best among us with hostility and incivility.”

Tweet This Post

This article by Adam Liptak of the New York Times notes that Supreme Court clerks have been going into politically-oriented jobs, including politicized law firms and academic institutions that increasingly match the inclinations of their hiring Justices.

We are proud at ReputationDefender to have hired Dave Thompson, who just finished his clerkship for Justice Scalia. We think we are the first startup ever to have won a SCOTUS clerk right out of his or her clerkship. Perhaps the authors of the study will take another look at how hiring is trending after all…..

Michael

Tweet This Post