http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/ ReputationDefender Blog | Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:33:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-11355 Reputation Management, Internet Privacy, and Social Media Quick Hits : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of ReputationDefender Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:08:41 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-11355 [...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the ReputationDefender Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...] [...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the ReputationDefender Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-11351 Rob Frappier Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:25:05 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-11351 FYI - In moderating this post, I deleted a couple of comments that were straying from the analysis. FYI – In moderating this post, I deleted a couple of comments that were straying from the analysis.

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-11341 Reputation Defender : Reputation Management, Internet Privacy, and Social Media Quick Hits Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:20 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-11341 [...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the ReputationDefender Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...] [...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the ReputationDefender Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-10880 Reputation Defender : The Decade in Review: Wrapping Up 2000-2009 Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:51:01 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-10880 [...] the problem of defamation online hasn’t abated. While some victims of anonymous slander have successfully argued their cases in court, the vast majority of individuals don’t have the time and resources needed to fight back [...] [...] the problem of defamation online hasn’t abated. While some victims of anonymous slander have successfully argued their cases in court, the vast majority of individuals don’t have the time and resources needed to fight back [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9256 Liskula Cohen case reminder: Consider the source | STL Social Media Guy Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:19:48 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9256 [...] 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google “skank” decision ReputationDefender Blog | August 27, 2009 Nice summary of some of the issues that have been discussed in this case. [...] [...] 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google “skank” decision ReputationDefender Blog | August 27, 2009 Nice summary of some of the issues that have been discussed in this case. [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9210 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google “skank” decision : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of ReputationDefender Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:20:01 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9210 [...] Myth 2: Google is on the hook  (link here) [...] [...] Myth 2: Google is on the hook  (link here) [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9204 ReputationDefender Blog : Rosemary Port’s privacy lawsuit against Google is a guaranteed loser Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:25:43 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9204 [...] As legions of other chattering experts have said, Rosemary Port’s lawsuit is a guaranteed loser. [...] [...] As legions of other chattering experts have said, Rosemary Port’s lawsuit is a guaranteed loser. [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9201 Twitted by SlashTopics Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:30:01 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9201 [...] This post was Twitted by SlashTopics [...] [...] This post was Twitted by SlashTopics [...]

]]>