http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/ ReputationDefender Blog | Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:33:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9439 Tommy K. Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:18:05 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/#comment-9439 Lee Baker of Citizens Media Law Project is critical of this decision. Lee Baker of Citizens Media Law Project is critical of this decision.

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9211 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google “skank” decision : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of ReputationDefender Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:20:17 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/#comment-9211 [...] we have already said once, this is not a big First Amendment case.  The First Amendment is important to a free and healthy [...] [...] we have already said once, this is not a big First Amendment case.  The First Amendment is important to a free and healthy [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9199 ReputationDefender Blog : 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google “skank” decision Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:40:21 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/#comment-9199 [...] to reveal the identity of a blogger who allegedly defamed model Liskula Cohen (the court order, our legal analysis, and our initial coverage), there has been a lot of misinformation floating around the Internet.  [...] [...] to reveal the identity of a blogger who allegedly defamed model Liskula Cohen (the court order, our legal analysis, and our initial coverage), there has been a lot of misinformation floating around the Internet.  [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9165 ReputationDefender Blog : Update: Full text of the Liskula Cohen Court Order Responding to Subpoena of Google to ID Anonymous Blogger Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:36:43 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/#comment-9165 [...] Legal impact of the Liskula Cohen court order (the “skank” decision) → [...] [...] Legal impact of the Liskula Cohen court order (the “skank” decision) → [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9163 ReputationDefender Blog : ‘Skank’ Blogger Sues Google for $15M, Claims Violation of Her Right to Privacy Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:25:54 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/#comment-9163 [...] ReputationDefender Blog’s analysis of the Cohen v. Google trial, we remarked that Cohen won the right to sue because “the use of terms like [...] [...] ReputationDefender Blog’s analysis of the Cohen v. Google trial, we remarked that Cohen won the right to sue because “the use of terms like [...]

]]> http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9030 Legal impact of the Liskula Cohen court order (the “skank” decision) : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of ReputationDefender Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:10:15 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/19/legal-impact-of-the-liskula-cohen-court-order-the-skank-decision/#comment-9030 [...] (see analysis inside...) (more…) [...] [...] (see analysis inside…) (more…) [...]

]]>