<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googlebombing John McCain &#8211; The new form of negative campaigning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/</link>
	<description>ReputationDefender Blog &#124; Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5555</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Online Reputation Management Glossary : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of ReputationDefender</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-11582</link>
		<dc:creator>An Online Reputation Management Glossary : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of ReputationDefender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-11582</guid>
		<description>[...] flaming. Flaming is strongly discouraged on most  internet forums but still happens frequently when  politics is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] flaming. Flaming is strongly discouraged on most  internet forums but still happens frequently when  politics is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation Defender : Behind the Michelle Obama Google Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-10365</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation Defender : Behind the Michelle Obama Google Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-10365</guid>
		<description>[...] most relevant results&#8230;usually. As we&#8217;ve seen with this Michelle Obama case, and with John McCain before her, with the right technical knowhow and a little bit of time, Google results can be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most relevant results&#8230;usually. As we&#8217;ve seen with this Michelle Obama case, and with John McCain before her, with the right technical knowhow and a little bit of time, Google results can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goon</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-3863</link>
		<dc:creator>goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-3863</guid>
		<description>http://pown.it/2111
this is another awesome Mccain parody...  check it out. Its hilarious...(actually it  would be hilarious if the whole Mccain situation wouldn&#039;t be that sad)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://pown.it/2111" rel="nofollow">http://pown.it/2111</a><br />
this is another awesome Mccain parody&#8230;  check it out. Its hilarious&#8230;(actually it  would be hilarious if the whole Mccain situation wouldn&#8217;t be that sad)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheabe</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>The meek may inherit the earth, but not its mineral rights.--John Paul Getty (1892--1976), U.S. industrialist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The meek may inherit the earth, but not its mineral rights.&#8211;John Paul Getty (1892&#8211;1976), U.S. industrialist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BloogsToli</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>BloogsToli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>Even if you are on the right track, you&#039;ll get run over if you just sit there.--Will Rogers, (1879--1935), U.S. humorist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you are on the right track, you&#8217;ll get run over if you just sit there.&#8211;Will Rogers, (1879&#8211;1935), U.S. humorist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john mccain blog</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>john mccain blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] that he&#039;s trying to change the course of the election by Googlebombing john McCain. Is he right?http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-...Things younger than Republican Presidential candidate oh, and did ...???The Wizard of Oz??? is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that he&#8217;s trying to change the course of the election by Googlebombing john McCain. Is he right?http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-&#8230;Things younger than Republican Presidential candidate oh, and did &#8230;???The Wizard of Oz??? is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The short attention span of web searchers: most never read past 3 results &#8212; ReputationDefender Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>The short attention span of web searchers: most never read past 3 results &#8212; ReputationDefender Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting reads: Political dirty tricks and Google - The 2008 Election and Faces of MySpace [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting reads: Political dirty tricks and Google &#8211; The 2008 Election and Faces of MySpace [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wendt</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wendt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think someone as young and as hip as Obama, remember he can fist bump,  has anything to worry about when it comes to losing the internet to the McCain supporters and their wireless access from their retirement homes.

So to me it just looks like a waste of a perfectly good Googlebomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think someone as young and as hip as Obama, remember he can fist bump,  has anything to worry about when it comes to losing the internet to the McCain supporters and their wireless access from their retirement homes.</p>
<p>So to me it just looks like a waste of a perfectly good Googlebomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snarko</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>snarko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>I say FAIR GAME. It&#039;s in total public domain, and up to the people with guts and smarts to make it happen.

Bloggers aren&#039;t buying those top spots with millions from corporations... THAT&#039;S not fair. Often irrelevant, but they bought it. It&#039;s just another grassroots tool. And yes, both sides can do it... so how is it not fair?

It&#039;s not even more manipulation than Fox News. People need to read between the lines and quit being so blind to truth sitting right there. FAIR GAME.

Oh, I stop at page five. I&#039;m burying my own competition; that&#039;s where she lives now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say FAIR GAME. It&#8217;s in total public domain, and up to the people with guts and smarts to make it happen.</p>
<p>Bloggers aren&#8217;t buying those top spots with millions from corporations&#8230; THAT&#8217;S not fair. Often irrelevant, but they bought it. It&#8217;s just another grassroots tool. And yes, both sides can do it&#8230; so how is it not fair?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not even more manipulation than Fox News. People need to read between the lines and quit being so blind to truth sitting right there. FAIR GAME.</p>
<p>Oh, I stop at page five. I&#8217;m burying my own competition; that&#8217;s where she lives now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miserable Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Miserable Failure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2008/06/22/googlebombing-john-mccain-the-new-form-of-negative-campaigning/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>&quot;this is the first time that there has been a public attempt to influence a presidential election by artificially inflating the negative publicity surrounding a candidate through a Googlebomb&quot;

Um. No. See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_Google_bombs_in_the_2004_U.S._Presidential_election

&quot;It’s also possible that this will lead to an arms race on the Internet between campaigns.&quot; 

Of course. During the 2006 midterms, both sides launched Googlebombs against each other, and both sides are Googlebombing each other right now. It&#039;s not just OpenLeft that&#039;s doing this, take a look around the political blogosphere, Googlebombs are flying around like mad right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;this is the first time that there has been a public attempt to influence a presidential election by artificially inflating the negative publicity surrounding a candidate through a Googlebomb&#8221;</p>
<p>Um. No. See this: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_Google_bombs_in_the_2004_U.S._Presidential_election" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_Google_bombs_in_the_2004_U.S._Presidential_election</a></p>
<p>&#8220;It’s also possible that this will lead to an arms race on the Internet between campaigns.&#8221; </p>
<p>Of course. During the 2006 midterms, both sides launched Googlebombs against each other, and both sides are Googlebombing each other right now. It&#8217;s not just OpenLeft that&#8217;s doing this, take a look around the political blogosphere, Googlebombs are flying around like mad right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
